March 2019

March 2019

March 2019 Global Forum

Table of Contents

Subscribe

Love Global Forum‘s new online format? Subscribe today and never miss an issue.

Executive Leadership | From the Editor-in-Chief

March 2019
Vienna: The Third (Wo)Man*
Alberto Grignolo

Alberto Grignolo, PhD
Editor-in-Chief
Global Forum
Fellow of DIA

A

drug development scientist, an information technologist, and a patient walk into a café while attending a conference in Vienna. The scientist orders a hot chocolate; the technologist orders a slice of strudel; the patient orders nothing. Puzzled, the scientist and the technologist encourage her to enjoy one of the many local delicacies. The patient declines and replies: “Actually, I did not want to come here at all, but you insisted. I don’t like sweets. But you never asked me if I did.”

DIA Europe 2019 in Vienna (February 5-7) brought to the surface both the excitement and the tension being created by rapid advances in translational medicine and information technology, highlighting the imperative of asking and understanding what patients actually need.

Editorial Board

Content stream editors

Translational science
Gary Kelloff US National Institutes of Health
David Parkinson ESSA Pharma, Inc.

regulatory science
Yoshiaki Uyama Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)
Adora Ndu BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Patient engagement
Deborah Collyar Patient Advocates In Research (PAIR)
Lode Dewulf Servier

Value & access
Edith Frénoy European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)

Editorial Staff

Alberto Grignolo, Editor-in-Chief PAREXEL International

Ranjini Prithviraj, Global Associate Director, Content Collaboration DIA Publications

Sandra Blumenrath, Science Writer DIA Publications

Chris M. Slawecki, Senior Digital Copyeditor DIA Publications

Regional Editors

AFRICA
David Mukanga Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

ASEAN
Silke Vogel Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School

AUSTRALIA/NEW ZEALAND
Richard Day University of New South Wales, Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital

CANADA
Judith Glennie JL Glennie Consulting, Inc.
Megan Bettle Health Canada

CHINA
Ling Su Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Lilly Asia Ventures

Europe
Thomas Kühler Sanofi R&D

INDIA
J. Vijay Venkatraman Oviya MedSafe

JAPAN
Kazuhiro Kanmuri Inter-Professional, Inc.

USA
Ebony Dashiell-Aje FDA

Young Professionals Editor

Kaley Weintraub Rutgers Post-Doctoral Fellow, Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.

DIA Membership

Bringing together stakeholders for the betterment of global health care.

Cancer, Cloud Computing, and a National Research Data Ecosystem for Cancer
Warren A. Kibbe
Chief, Translational Biomedical Informatics, and Chief Data Officer
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University
O

pen science and open data initiatives have become somewhat of a cause célèbre due in part to activities like the European Public Sector Information (PSI) Directive and Plan S which are striving to make open access publication the norm in the EU. However, these activities are the result of many years of work to push open access for publicly-funded research data, including the Human Genome Project, Genbank, PubMed, PubMedCentral, the FDA’s Information Exchange and Data Innovation (INFORMED) and Sentinel initiatives, and a long cadre of important projects too numerous to mention. Groups like Force11 have pushed for the open sharing of data, most notably through the set of FAIR principles for making data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. Likewise, the private sector, particularly the pharmaceutical industry, has moved more and more activities into shared space. These initiatives include Project Datasphere and the Yale Open Data Access Project (YODA) for sharing clinical research data, TransCelerate to share pre-competitive biopharmaceutical data, and Transmart for sharing analytical tools and workflows. Companies like Vivli focus on extracting value from large, shared, and accessible clinical studies.

Four Things to Know About Digital Health
Information is just information until it’s actionable

Adam Istas

Science Writer
DIA

T

he proliferation of digital health applications—and their potential service to clinical and real world research—has led biopharmaceutical companies and device manufacturers to embrace these new technologies in a variety of ways for a variety of purposes. From streamlining clinical trial processes such as patient recruitment and informed consent, to obtaining real world data (RWD) in support of regulatory submissions and value dossiers, a number of innovative applications of digital health tools have emerged over the past decade. While some have been successful (and others less so), their collective experiences and continued advances in technology offer both learnings and warning signs for healthcare product manufacturers looking to address challenges and engage with patients through digital tools. Most encouragingly, these experiences help illuminate the consensus that patient-centered design and usability are critical components for success in any digital health initiative. The following is intended to help promote a better understanding of how patient-centered principles should be at the core of a digital health program.

White Paper

White Paper

Seven Essentials for Successful Drug Development

Podcasts

The Patient’s Most Engaging Question: Why?
Fair Market Value for Working with Patients: An Oxymoron?
Lode Dewulf
Chief Patient Officer

Servier
Deborah Collyar
Founder and President

Patient Advocates In Research (PAIR)
Tony Hoos
Former Head of Medical

Amgen Europe
F

rom laboratory bench to regulatory/payer approval and real world use, medicine development has reached, perhaps even crossed, a tipping point. Today, the risk of not working with patients in the medicine lifecycle is higher than the risk of working with patients: A recent Economist Intelligence Unit report commissioned by PAREXEL found that trials using patient-centric designs were 19% more likely to be launched compared to trials that did not. Studies and product launches that failed because insights from patients were not sought remain lasting and powerful reminders of today’s new reality.

Even so, the need and commitment to work with patients and the broader patient community, including family and caregivers, also raises new questions and challenges. Among them, the question of fair compensation for such work is gaining increasing attention.

Around The Globe

How New Regulations Are Changing Product Approvals in India

New Process Leads to Better Outcomes for Clinical Trials AND Patients

Ramesh Jagannathan
Head of Clinical Development
Biocon Research Ltd.
T

he regulation of new drug development and approval in India has evolved significantly in recent years and has enabled the entry of important new medicines onto the market for the benefit of millions of Indian patients. The change has been gradual but steady; key success factors have included the establishment of Subject Expert Committees (SECs) empowered to evaluate complex clinical data in depth and detail and advise the Regulatory Authority.

The gold standard for studying the safety and efficacy of new medicines in development is the randomized controlled trial (RCT). RCTs are designed to answer specific disease outcome and other patient-related questions, and are usually required by regulatory bodies across the world as the basis for their approval of new medicines. Clinical research studies on human participants are designed to answer specific questions about new medicines through key considerations such as study population and design, choice of comparator(s), adequate number of subjects, efficacy end-points and statistical analysis, safety data, patient-reported outcomes, and relevance to specific countries or regions for future clinical use. These trials are conducted after the required regulatory authorities and ethics committees review and approve their study protocols, which document these considerations; this often includes providing feedback on that investigational product’s clinical development plan.

Podcasts

EUnetHTA: Post-Launch Evidence Critical in Comparative Data

Around The Globe

Regenerative Medicine Advancing in Japan

Demonstrating global leadership in scientific and healthcare innovation

Kazuhiro Takekita
Associate Professor
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery,
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
Satoshi Yasuda
Chief
Division of Cell-Based Therapeutic Products
National Institute of Health Science
Kazuhiro Kanmuri
Founder & CEO
Inter-professional, Inc.
I

nnovation and collaborative initiatives have been promoted as national imperatives in the field of regenerative medicine in Japan ever since Professor Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology in 2012 for his pioneering work on iPS cells. To develop regenerative technologies and treatments, it is critical that industry, academic, and regulatory stakeholders collaboratively discuss challenges in developing these products systematically, comprehensively, and without sectional or functional borders. Non-clinical toxicology, clinical planning and development, and manufacturing processes are only a few examples of current challenges in regenerative medicine.

Learning how to identify and listen to the voices of various stakeholders (e.g., regulatory policy, healthcare system, pricing/reimbursement system, human rights and ethics, patient access and education, etc.), along with the global nature of modern healthcare, further stresses the importance of such collaboration in regenerative medicine.

Since 2016, DIA Japan has convened these and other stakeholders involved in developing cell therapy products, particularly those from industry and academia, for an annual cell therapy products symposium. In response to requests from these stakeholders and developments in this field, the 3rd DIA Cell & Gene Therapy Products Symposium in Japan in December 2018 incorporated gene therapy products in its agenda.

Young Professionals’ Corner

Investing In Your Own Career

Anastasiya Voitsik
Post-Doctoral Fellow, Rutgers/Sanofi


Investing In Your Own Career

Anastasiya Voitsik
Post-Doctoral Fellow, Rutgers/Sanofi


W

hen you hear about investing, you may think about savings and stock accounts. But when it comes to investing in your career, the focus may shift to education, including degrees, didactic courses, certifications, and trainings. To ensure that I would be professionally competitive after graduation, I completed a biomedical research technician training program, obtained a dual doctorate and master’s degree, and received basic life support training. These opportunities certainly helped prepare me for my career. But other opportunities with lower or even no cost have invested just as much if not more into my life.

These daily tips can help you excel in your career and keep you on track toward reaching your goals without breaking your budget.

Thanks for reading our March 2019 Issue!