Meeting Highlights: DIA Global Annual Meeting 2024
Regulatory Roundup: Insights from Global Town Halls at DIA 2024
Sorcha McCrohan
DIA
R

egulators worldwide recently convened in San Diego for DIA’s Global Annual Meeting 2024 to discuss respective countries’ priorities and chart new horizons in reimagining regulatory processes, alignment, and collaboration. Regulatory representation at several Town Halls included intergovernmental bodies like the World Health Organization (WHO), international coalitions such as the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA), and regional agencies including the US FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Health Canada, ANVISA (Brazil), PMDA (Japan), and NMPA (China). The meeting also featured the Access Consortium, a coalition of regulatory authorities from Australia, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

These Town Halls exposed the heterogeneity of regional regulatory systems, supporting ongoing efforts to achieve greater regulatory harmonization. Such efforts would serve to streamline processes, reduce duplication of global health initiatives, and promote equitable access to safe and efficacious medicines worldwide.

Regional Highlights

Modernizing Brazil’s Pharmaceutical Oversight to Promote Regulatory Excellence
ANVISA’s current focus is on modernization, innovation, and strengthening surveillance to mitigate vulnerabilities in the country’s regulatory landscape. With Brazil being the seventh largest pharmaceutical market globally, ANVISA plays a significant role in ensuring access to medicines by monitoring market prices and shortages in collaboration with the Pharmaceutical Market Regulation Chamber.

2004 marked ANVISA’s integration into the Pharmaceutical Inspection Cooperation Scheme (PIC/S), with full membership achieved in November 2020. During the pandemic, ANVISA implemented temporary procedures for GMP certification, accepting the emergency use of remote inspection reports from foreign regulatory authorities instead of in-person visits. GMP inspections within and outside Brazil resumed in September 2021. In May 2022, ANVISA addressed delayed certification applications, highlighting lessons learned in active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturing and pharmaceutical supply chain investments. Regulatory reliance initiatives in 2022 included hosting the PIC/S Expert Circle on Quality Risk Management in São Paulo and establishing transparency criteria for analysis by foreign regulatory authorities. Normative Instruction 292/2024 outlined reference authorities and reliance practices for GMP inspections of medicines, APIs, vaccines, and both biological and cannabis products.

Canada’s Strategic Initiatives for Modernization and Advancing Drug Regulation
Health Canada has introduced three strategic initiatives that underscore their commitment to modernizing its regulatory framework to ameliorate current and future challenges in drug regulation within the country, which holds a 2.2% share of the global pharmaceutical market.

  • Advancing agile licensing for drugs: Implementing COVID-19 response-tested amendments to increase licensing flexibility.
  • Clinical trial modernization: Enhancing data integrity and transparency, supporting decentralized trials, and modernizing compliance and enforcement practices.
  • Precision regulating: Developing tools for tailored regulatory responses to address market disruptions and unmet needs.

Japan’s PMDA Expands Opportunities in Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices
Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) is expanding its market for new drugs through collaboration with the US and EU, focusing on developing and distributing innovative medicines and medical devices. Various factors make Japan a strategic and attractive investment destination in the pharmaceutical and medical device sectors.

  1. Attractive Market: Japan (the third-largest pharmaceutical market) is a gateway to Asian markets for regulatory harmonization and clinical development, leading by example through Universal Health Coverage (UHC), which enhances patient access to urgent medicines.
  2. Flexibility and Predictability: Since Japan’s regulations are based on ICH standards, there is pledged commitment to international harmonization. The benefits of this commitment include Japan’s prompt NDA reviews and National Health Insurance Drug Price determinations within 60 days without HTA (Health Technology Assessment), as well as a transparent review timeline with predictable sales timing post-NDA approval.
  3. Designation for Product Characteristics: Japan provides early designation, tax incentives, and grant-in-aid for orphan drug research and development. The Sakigake designation supports rapid reviews and accelerates the regulatory process.
  4. MRCTs Acceleration: Japan allows later-phase MRCTs without prior phase 1 trials for overseas-developed drugs if safety for Japanese subjects is managed, although pharmacokinetic data collection is recommended. This change intends to boost international collaboration and streamline drug development, especially for orphan and pediatric medicines.

EMA’s Initiatives in Drug Development and Regulatory Advancement
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) fosters drug development through varied platforms and initiatives. The EMA Innovation Task Force (ITF) serves as a multidisciplinary forum for preliminary, informal dialogues on innovative methods and medicines, addressing scientific, legal, and regulatory matters at no cost to prepare sponsors for formal regulatory interactions, classify borderline products, and aid in horizon scanning — a systematic method used to provide information on early signs of medicines in development or new uses of existing medicines that could shift paradigms after the product has entered the market.

The EU Innovation Network (EU-IN), founded in 2015, amplifies regulatory backing by uniting representatives from national competent authority (NCA) innovation offices and the ITF, promoting best practices and engagement among regulators and innovators. Furthermore, the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) plays a pivotal role in evaluating ATMPs, providing scientific perspectives, and validating data, thus advancing regulatory transparency and global development efforts.

Pioneering Decentralized Clinical Trials: FDA Recommendations and Future Directions
The FDA shared recommendations and future trends related to Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCT), advocating for patient-centered trial methodologies, international harmonization of DCT guidelines, and advancements in regulatory frameworks to support these initiatives. Incorporating DCT elements into clinical trial protocols requires deliberation and adherence to evolving regulatory standards. Yet, the benefits of DCT integration can markedly supplement trial flexibility and patient-centricity if the integration is closely aligned with the updated FDA and global regulatory guidelines, including implementing ICH E6 R3 Annex-2 standards.

Ensuring data integrity across decentralized trial sites requires decisive planning and action and often necessitates the adoption of robust data flow diagrams and monitoring strategies. DCT-specific challenges are bound to arise in inspections, which makes thorough documentation of data handling processes critical. However, the benefits and risks associated with DCT must be weighed during stakeholder engagement, which requires collaboration between regulators, trial sites, and patients.

FDA presenters asked (and immediately thereafter answered) the question: How will DCT operations be streamlined in the future? By technological advances and remote monitoring. Many experts anticipate that future clinical trial designs will increasingly adopt patient-centric approaches, thereby accommodating diverse demographics and preferences, for example, through telehealth home services and remote/e-consent. This is why flexibility is key: regulatory bodies must champion innovative trial designs that enrich data quality and participant safety in decentralized settings.

Forging Regulatory Pathways in the Middle East and Africa
A number of critical initiatives are in process in the Middle East with the same objective: to elevate the pharmaceutical landscape, particularly through strengthening regulatory governance to refine clinical trial oversight and fostering investment (notably through venture capital) to create an attractive ecosystem for the pharmaceutical sector under one roof via collaboration with international platforms.

  1. Transforming MENA into a Biotech Leader by 2030 and Internationally by 2040: Since 2021, $3.9 billion has been invested in initiatives such as the Saudi Human Genome Program and the Saudi Network for Clinical Trials, with the goal of achieving 100% population coverage on a central medical records system.
  2. Launch of M42 by G42: A pioneering, technology-enhanced, integrated healthcare initiative. The Emirati Genome Programme aims to leverage genomic data to improve the health of the Emirati population.
  3. Investing in Life Sciences: The Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) has made significant investments in tech-driven treatment development, contrasting the global reduction in life sciences activity by other investors.

Africa is also transforming its pharmaceutical landscape through initiatives — such as the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (AMRH), the African Medicines Agency (AMA), AVAREF, AfCFTA, and the AU model law — intended at moving towards a single market.

NMPA’s Commitment to Accelerating Access to Innovative Medications
China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) is taking pronounced steps to accelerate the availability of new medications, particularly for urgent clinical needs. Recently, the NMPA approved a monotherapy for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), marking the first orally available selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein XPO1. Approval was received based on promising results from the registrational SEARCH study conducted in China, which demonstrated significant and durable response rates.

Through collaboration with ICH, ICMRA, and PIC/S, the NMPA promotes global parallel research and development efforts. One effort specifically mentioned was Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD). PFDD methodically integrates patients’ experiences, perspectives, needs, and priorities into drug development and evaluation; it is an approach that ensures that treatments are directly pertinent to the patient, dependent on them, and scientifically robust. (The US FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research [CDER] has also implemented a Patient-Focused Drug Development initiative.)

ICMRA Post-Pandemic: Strengthening Global Regulatory Alignment and Collaboration
During the COVID-19 pandemic, ICMRA proved pivotal in global regulatory efforts, serving as an executive-level strategic coordinating entity. ICMRA facilitated the sharing of timely information, which ensured regulatory alignment among its members and the WHO while fostering global-agreed approaches. This period underscored the necessity of ICMRA’s existence and demonstrable role in crisis response and regulatory convergence.

Post-pandemic, ICMRA continues to evolve across wide-ranging fronts, leading initiatives designed to enhance regulatory agility and coordination during emergencies, such as developing the Public Health Emergency Clinical Trials Working Group that provides ongoing crisis response efforts. ICMRA also established the Pharmaceutical Quality Knowledge Management System (PQKMS) to enable synergies among regulators, industry, and international organizations like the ICH, emphasizing collaborative assessments and standards development to enhance global regulatory practices. In the future, ICMRA foresees further leveraging advances in AI to streamline regulatory processes and address emerging challenges in drug and device regulation globally.

Strategic Impact of WHO-Listed Authorities in Elevating Regulatory Reliance
On May 20, 2024, the European Medicines Regulatory Network (EMRN) was designated a WHO Listed Authority (WLA), denoting a noteworthy milestone as the first regional regulatory network to achieve this status. This designation recognizes the European Commission, the EMA, and the human medicines agencies of 27 EU countries plus three European Economic Area – European Free Trade Area (EEA-EFTA) countries. It signifies that the entire network and each agency meet the foremost regulatory standards for the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicines and products.

The WLA status augments credibility in global health initiatives by promoting regulatory convergence, harmonization, and international cooperation, thereby underscoring the EU’s commitment to maintaining credible and transparent regulatory practices worldwide. The WHO’s collaboration with the EMRN includes two notable efforts to build up regulatory capacity, promote regulatory convergence, and support systems to prevent and respond to defective and counterfeit medical products, which aligns with Mandate Resolution WHA 67.

Commonalities and Conclusions

These sessions collectively highlighted a global commitment to harmonized regulations, innovation-driven healthcare strategies, and patient-centric policies for advancing public health through streamlined regulatory practices, and revealed several common global priorities:

  1. Modernization and Innovation: Global regulatory frameworks are evolving to embrace technological advances and support innovation in drug development, with a keen focus on agility and transparency.
  2. Data Integrity and Transparency: There is a worldwide, “across the board” emphasis on enhancing data reliability and transparency in clinical trials and regulatory processes, as well as standardizing data elements.
  3. Support for Decentralized Clinical Trials: Regulatory bodies globally are gradually becoming more supportive of DCTs, aiming to improve patient access and ensure data quality while aligning with international standards.
  4. International Collaboration and Harmonization: Fostering collaboration among regulatory authorities promotes mutual recognition of inspections and harmonizes regulatory requirements to ultimately streamline global drug development.
  5. Author with FDA Commissioner Robert Califf.
    Author with FDA Commissioner Robert Califf.
  6. Patient-Centric Approaches: There is prioritization to integrate patient perspectives into regulatory decisions to ensure patient safety and facilitate access to innovative medicines and therapies. Emphasizing patient-reported outcomes is essential for the development and approval of therapies that address what matters most to patients, ultimately resolving to improve their quality of life.
  7. Regulatory Flexibility in Response to Challenges: Regulators are showing a willingness to adapt their processes to the rapid pace of development for advanced therapies and medical products, especially those that address the most acute unmet medical needs (e.g., rare diseases). Flexibility must be engendered to accommodate surfacing scientific evidence and to accelerate critical treatments in response to global challenges (e.g., pandemics).
  8. Enhanced Regulatory Transparency: Efforts to increase transparency include increasing public accessibility to regulatory information, engaging stakeholders in decision-making processes, and ensuring accountability.